Initial 3‐year outcomes with left ventricular assist devices in a country with a nascent heart transplantation program
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIMS The need for the left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in patients with end-stage heart failure is well established, but prior to 2011, this was not available to patients in Kazakhstan. We describe the development of the sole LVAD programme in the context of a nascent heart transplantation programme and clinical outcomes for the first three years. METHODS AND RESULTS From November 2011 to November 2014, 146 patients underwent implantation of 152 VADs (approximately 50 devices implanted per year). We retrospectively analyzed data from 135 LVAD patients who received HeartMate II (n = 95) or HeartWare (n = 40) devices. In 75 patients LVAD was used as a bridge-to-transplantation and in 60 patients as destination therapy, but only 3 of 135 LVAD patients received heart transplant. Forty-three patients of the LVAD cohort had died by the end of the follow-up period. The mean time on LVAD was 466 ± 330 days (range 5-1200 days). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for patients who continued on LVAD support were 93% after 1 month, 86% after 6 months and 77% after 12 months. The most common complications within the first 30 days after implant included right ventricular failure (n = 20, 1.85 events/patient-year), renal failure (n = 19, 1.76 events/patient-year) and bleeding (n = 33, 3.0 events/patient-year). Beyond 30 days adverse events included driveline infections (n = 46, 0.56 events/patient-year) and stroke (n = 33, 0.21 events/patient-year). CONCLUSIONS LVADs are an important therapeutic alternative to heart transplantation in the context of a developing heart transplant programme with outcomes that are comparable to those reported by other centres.
منابع مشابه
Three-year outcomes with left ventricular assist devices in country with restricted heart transplantation
Background/Introduction As a consequence of limited donor availability, there has been a growing interest for alternative strategies, such as left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as either a bridge to transplantation (BTT) or as destination therapy (DT) for the treatment of the advanced heart failure. The heart transplant program in Kazakhstan is in a nascent stage and therefore patients that...
متن کاملDesign an Equivalent Left Ventricular Assist Device for Medical Equipment Labs
LVAD is a mechanical pump supporting a weak heart function and blood flow. Sometimes, the heart may not recover fast enough to take over the pumping action immediately after surgery, in such patients a temporary support device has been employed to maintain the pumping action until the patient’s own heart recovers. This device can be considered as a temporary alternative before the process of ar...
متن کاملLeft ventricular assist devices decrease fixed pulmonary hypertension in cardiac transplant candidates.
OBJECTIVE Fixed pulmonary hypertension is a contraindication for cardiac transplantation because of the increased risk of donor heart failure. We sought to determine whether left ventricular assist devices improve fixed pulmonary hypertension in cardiac transplant candidates to enable safe cardiac transplantation. METHODS Thirty-five consecutive cardiac transplant candidates (age 56 +/- 6 yea...
متن کاملFour-year outcomes with third-generation centrifugal left ventricular assist devices in an era of restricted transplantation
OBJECTIVES Third-generation ventricular assist devices (VADs) are associated with improved outcomes, though in recent clinical trials bridge-to-transplant (BTT) rates are ∼30% at 6 months, so that transplantation can be used as a 'bail out' for serious complications. In the UK, there was a significant reduction in heart transplantation rates over the last decade, so that transplantation from VA...
متن کاملLeft ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for end-stage heart failure.
In the therapy of advanced heart failure, left ventricular assist devices represent an exciting new option. The role of mechanical circulatory support is currently limited predominantly by factors related to device durability. The population for whom mechanical circulatory support can be considered as permanent therapy is defined by those for whom improvement in survival and clinical function i...
متن کامل